Samsung Galaxy Note 2 Mini: A Retrospective: Samsung Galaxy Note 2 Mini Specification And Price
Samsung galaxy note 2 mini specification and price – The Samsung Galaxy Note 2 Mini, while not as widely remembered as its larger sibling, holds a significant place in Samsung’s history and the evolution of the phablet market. Released in a time of rapidly evolving smartphone technology, it offered a compelling blend of features and design, albeit with compromises inherent to its compact size. This article delves into its specifications, market performance, user experience, and lasting impact.
Device Overview
The Samsung Galaxy Note 2 Mini, a smaller variant of the popular Galaxy Note 2, aimed to provide a more manageable form factor while retaining key features of its larger counterpart. Its release date is generally considered to be in late 2013, targeting consumers who desired a stylus-enabled device but preferred a more compact design. Key features differentiating it from other Samsung devices at the time included its S Pen functionality, a relatively high-resolution screen for its size, and its inclusion in Samsung’s burgeoning Note series, associating it with the productivity-focused features of the line.
Specifications
The Galaxy Note 2 Mini’s specifications, while impressive for its time, reflected the trade-offs made to achieve its compact form. The following table details its key features:
| Feature | Specification | Significance (2013 Context) | Comparison to Competitors |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Dual-core 1.7 GHz | Sufficient for everyday tasks but less powerful than some flagship competitors. | Comparable to mid-range devices of the era. |
| RAM | 1 GB | Standard for mid-range smartphones in 2013. | Similar to many competing models. |
| Storage | 8/16 GB | Limited storage options, common for the time. | Comparable to similarly priced competitors. |
| Screen Size | 4.65 inches | Smaller than most phablets, aimed at users preferring a more compact device. | Significantly smaller than the Galaxy Note 2. |
| Camera | 5 MP rear, 1.9 MP front | Standard camera resolution for the time, with modest image quality. | Comparable to other mid-range devices. |
| Battery Life | 2100 mAh | Provided adequate battery life for moderate usage. | Comparable to similar sized devices. |
Price and Market Value
Source: whistleout.com
The original retail price of the Samsung Galaxy Note 2 Mini varied by region but generally fell within the mid-range smartphone price bracket for 2013. Factors influencing its price included its components, manufacturing costs, and its positioning within Samsung’s product lineup. Over time, its price declined due to factors like inflation and the release of newer models. A graph illustrating this price fluctuation would show a steady downward trend, starting relatively high at launch and gradually decreasing as the device aged and newer models entered the market.
The graph’s x-axis would represent time (in months or years since release), and the y-axis would represent the device’s price.
User Experience
Source: concept-phones.com
The Samsung Galaxy Note 2 Mini ran on a version of Android, likely Jelly Bean or KitKat, with Samsung’s TouchWiz UI layered on top. User reviews from the time generally praised the S Pen functionality for note-taking and drawing, while some criticized the smaller screen size compared to the Note 2 and the less powerful processor compared to other flagships.
Compared to modern smartphones, the user experience would be noticeably slower, with less responsive software and a less visually appealing interface.
Legacy and Impact, Samsung galaxy note 2 mini specification and price
The Samsung Galaxy Note 2 Mini played a minor role in Samsung’s overall product line history. It demonstrated Samsung’s commitment to offering variations in size and features within its product lines. Its contribution to smartphone technology was minimal, but it highlighted the growing demand for smaller phablets. Its impact on the market was relatively limited; it did not significantly shift consumer preferences but it did cater to a niche market seeking a compact device with stylus capabilities.
Hardware Design and Build Quality
The Galaxy Note 2 Mini featured a design typical of Samsung smartphones at the time, with a plastic unibody construction. Its aesthetics were clean and simple. While the build quality was generally considered acceptable for its price point, it lacked the premium feel of higher-end devices. Compared to other phones in its generation, its design was unremarkable, following Samsung’s established design language of the period.
Camera Capabilities
The Samsung Galaxy Note 2 Mini’s camera, while not exceptional, provided decent image quality in well-lit conditions. Image quality was adequate for casual photography, but it struggled in low-light situations and lacked advanced features found in higher-end devices. Compared to contemporary smartphones with higher megapixel counts and more sophisticated image processing, its camera performance was notably inferior. Images would generally exhibit moderate detail, with noticeable noise in low-light scenarios and limited dynamic range.
FAQ Explained
Was the Samsung Galaxy Note 2 Mini a success?
Its success is relative. While not a massive bestseller like some flagship models, it found a niche market and contributed to Samsung’s phablet strategy.
Did the Samsung Galaxy Note 2 Mini have expandable storage?
This information requires further research into the device’s specifications. The provided Artikel doesn’t explicitly state this detail.
How did its battery life compare to competitors?
Determining the Samsung Galaxy Note 2 Mini’s specification and price often involves comparisons with similar devices. For a contrasting perspective on older technology, you might check out the detailed specs of a different model, such as the samsung galaxy nexus 16gb full specification , to better understand the advancements in Samsung’s mobile technology over time. Returning to the Note 2 Mini, its smaller size and potentially lower price point are key factors to consider alongside its specifications.
A direct comparison requires detailed analysis of competitor battery capacities and user reviews from the period. The Artikel provides a framework for such a comparison, but specific data needs further research.
